ReviewClinical and translational science2025
Evaluation of the Landscape of Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers in GM1 and GM2 Gangliosidosis.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-nucleus RNA sequencing reveals excitatory and inhibitory neuronal subtype imbalance and its potential regulatory mechanisms in GM1 gangliosidosis.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of the glycan biomarker H3N2b in GM1 Gangliosidosis.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2026Article
- Infantile GM1 Gangliosidosis with Epilepsy Associated with a Same-Codon GLB1 Variant (c.808T>G/c.808T>C).Genes · 2026Article
- Genetic Insights and Diagnostic Challenges in Highly Attenuated Lysosomal Storage Disorders.Genes · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GM1 and GM2 gangliosidosis are inherited, progressive, neurodegenerative lysosomal disorders of variable onset and disease progression. GM1 gangliosidosis is a result of biallelic pathogenic variants in the GLB1 gene, which confer absent or reduced β-galactosidase enzyme activity and lead to the accumulation of glycoconjugates such as glycosphingolipid GM1-gangliosides. GM2 is caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in one of the three genes (HEXA, HEXB, and GM2A) which confer deficiency of β-hexosaminidase or the GM2 ganglioside activator protein, responsible for the catabolism of GM2 gangliosides. In both gangliosidoses, glycosphingolipids accumulate primarily in neurons, with subsequent neuronal death, which translates to early mortality for patients. The clinical course is commonly differentiated by age of symptom onset. To date, no disease-modifying therapy has been approved globally, and treatment is typically supportive. The lack of mature biomarker development in these diseases contributes to challenges associated with quantifying treatment response. However, recent advancements in the detection of neurodegenerative biomarkers and treatment innovation have spurred interest in biomarker identification in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in patients with GM1 and GM2 gangliosidosis as pharmacodynamic endpoints to support clinical trials and regulatory decision-making. In this review, we assess the landscape of lipid and protein biomarkers, the extent of evidence, and propose considerations for future biomarker development to measure treatment response and support drug development in GM1 and GM2 gangliosidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.