ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Inferior Parietal Lobe Activity Reveals Bimanual Coupling and Interference.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visuomotor information drives interference between the hands more than dynamic motor information during bimanual reaching.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Developmental changes in independent bimanual coordination: evidence from the circles-lines coupling task in children aged 5-13 years.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When humans move both hands simultaneously, bimanual coupling or interference can occur. The circles-lines paradigm is used to study the bimanual coupling and interference effects: Participants simultaneously draw either lines or circles with both hands (congruent), or draw lines with one hand and circles with the other hand (incongruent condition). Despite extensive behavioral research on bimanual coupling with this paradigm, our knowledge of the neural circuitry involved remains limited. Here, we capitalized on the advantages provided by functional near-infrared spectroscopy to unveil the neural substrates of bimanual coupling within an ecologically valid experimental setting. Behavioral results confirmed previous literature, showing that the shapes become more oval due to the interference between the hands, causing the circle to resemble a line and vice versa. Additionally, performance in the congruent condition correlated with performance in the incongruent condition. From a neural perspective, we observed greater activity in sensorimotor areas and the right premotor area during the incongruent compared to the congruent condition. A novel temporal analysis of the time course of oxyhemoglobin signals revealed that the right hemisphere reached maximum amplitude before the left during the incongruent condition and revealed differences between conditions in parietal areas, showing that bimanual interference is associated not only with motor areas but also with associative areas. Finally, right inferior parietal lobe activity correlated with bimanual performance, suggesting a role for this area in bimanual tasks when the motor program of one hand is influenced by sensorimotor information from the contralateral hand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.