Observational studyOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Clinical and economic burden of achondroplasia in the United States: results from a retrospective, observational study.
Observational study in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical burden and healthcare resource utilization associated with achondroplasia: a real-world observational, retrospective cohort study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAchondroplasia, a disease characterized by disproportionate short stature and increased morbidity, affects daily function and quality of life over the lifetime of the individual. However, data are limited on its economic impact, especially related to healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs. This study aimed to characterize the clinical and economic impact of achondroplasia in the US relative to matched non-achondroplasia controls stratified by pediatric and adult populations.
methodsThis retrospective study used data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus national claims database from January 2008 to December 2021. Individuals diagnosed with achondroplasia (index event) between July 2008 and December 2020 were matched on age and sex (1:2 ratio) to non-achondroplasia controls. General comorbidities were evaluated in the pediatric and adult populations. All-cause HCRU and direct medical costs were determined for the 12-month post-index period; out-of-pocket (OOP) costs were also determined. Study variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsA total of 530 individuals with achondroplasia (47.7% pediatric and 52.3% adults) were matched with 1,060 controls. Individuals in the achondroplasia cohort had higher overall comorbidity burdens than controls. HCRU was higher in the achondroplasia cohort relative to controls, with outpatient visits the most frequently used resource. Inpatient visits were the primary driver of mean (SD) total costs, which were 14-fold higher than controls ($28,386 [$259,858] vs $2,031 [$5,418]) in pediatric individuals, and 4-fold higher in adults $21,579 [$58,817] vs $4,951 [$13,020]); prescriptions accounted for 4.7% and 7.4% of total costs in the pediatric and adult achondroplasia cohorts, respectively. The OOP costs were approximately 3-fold higher in both pediatric and adult individuals with achondroplasia relative to controls.
conclusionsIndividuals with achondroplasia are characterized by a higher comorbidity burden and substantially higher HCRU and related costs relative to matched controls. The results also suggest that despite high HCRU and costs, individuals with achondroplasia likely are not seen by providers early enough nor are they necessarily seen by appropriate specialists, indicating a need for improved care and disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.