Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016811›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Clinical education during a crisis lived experiences of nursing students in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Elsa Nilsson, Lina Pousette, Lina Emmesjö, Mikaela Ridelberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elsa NilssonThe municipality of Jönköping, Jönköping, Sweden.
Lina PousetteSkaraborgs sjukhus Skövde, Västra Götalandsregionen, Skövde, Sweden.
Lina EmmesjöSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, Skövde, SE-541 28, Sweden.
Mikaela RidelbergSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, Skövde, SE-541 28, Sweden. mikaela.ridelberg@his.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing education entails extensive training across varying settings where nursing students can practice their theoretical knowledge and practical skills for their future profession. Skills in evidence-based practice are pivotal competences for nurses and need to evolve from novice to expert skills. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Sweden had a unique approach to restrictions. The conditions for nursing students to apply their practical skills changed, as the COVID-19 pandemic influenced nursing education. Previous studies lacked focus on the clinical and practical aspects of the nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such experiences can provide valuable knowledge for nursing education, especially in preparing for future crises as well as understanding the needs of the nurses who were educated during the pandemic. The aim of this study is therefore to highlight the essence and understanding of the experiences of nursing students undertaking nursing education in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA qualitative interview study of nine nursing students recruited through a convenience sample. The data was analyzed through a phenomenological hermeneutic approach, chosen for two of the opportunity to use the researcher's preunderstanding. The result is presented in three main themes; Being disappointed yet accepting the situation, Feelings of uncertainty and the covid-19 pandemic provided new insights, the two latter are further divided into a total of eight subthemes.

resultsThe COVID-19 pandemic affected nursing students' experience with clinical learning and contributed to their unique experiences. Compared to students who began their nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic, those who started before the outbreak faced more significant adjustments in their learning. It was seen as positive for the student's future profession that a great focus was placed on how to prevent the spread of infection. The students experienced loneliness in the lack of support from other students, and fear of infecting or being infected. Furthermore, there was a lack of clinical placement and training hours, leading to worries of not being prepared. Opinions differed between the students on whether the clinical knowledge they acquired during the training was sufficient. Whilst the vast majority wanted more time for practical elements and training, they emphasized that this was not solely caused by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic but an effect of the design of the education.

conclusionsThe study showed that, through the shared experiences of nursing students who studied during the COVID-19 pandemic, education and the acquisition of clinical skills were affected. The students experienced feelings of loneliness in their isolation and fear of infecting or being infected throughout their education. However, the majority found themselves with a sense of acceptance of the situation, while there were also experiences of pausing the education because of the pandemic. Being a part of the group of nursing students participating in education during the COVID-19 pandemic gave new insights into the nursing profession regarding hygiene routine and hindering factors in communication with patients. Nursing students who have gone through their education during the COVID-19 pandemic have unique experiences such as preparedness of coming pandemics and the importance of reflection surrounding clinical education that are worthy of sharing. These experiences could be helpful when developing nursing education in the future and preparing for possible future crisis situations.

Indexed as

Clinical skillsCOVID-19InterviewsNursing educationPhenomenology

Identifiers

PMID40016811
PMCPMC11869574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.