ReviewJournal of translational medicine2025
Direct fibroblast reprogramming: an emerging strategy for treating organic fibrosis.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skin Aging: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic and Technological Innovations.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Transcriptome-guided development of a fibrosis-reversal compound reduces skin scarring and allows regeneration via mitochondrial uncoupling.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Targeting the glial-fibrotic scar microenvironment after spinal cord injury: From integrated protection to systematic regulation of regenerative balance.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Generation of oligodendrocyte precursor-like cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts using miR-7a mimics.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond blood pressure: the renin-angiotensin system as an innovative driver and therapeutic target in pathological scarring.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Injectable Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Myocardial Regeneration: A Review of the Literature.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Direct reprogramming has garnered considerable attention due to its capacity to directly convert differentiated cells into desired cells. Fibroblasts are frequently employed in reprogramming studies due to their abundance and accessibility. However, they are also the key drivers in the progression of fibrosis, a pathological condition characterized by excessive extracellular matrix deposition and tissue scarring. Furthermore, the initial stage of reprogramming typically involves deactivating fibrotic pathways. Hence, direct reprogramming offers a valuable method to regenerate target cells for tissue repair while simultaneously reducing fibrotic tendencies. Understanding the link between reprogramming and fibrosis could help develop effective strategies to treat damaged tissue with a potential risk of fibrosis. This review summarizes the advances in direct reprogramming and reveals their anti-fibrosis effects in various organs such as the heart, liver, and skin. Furthermore, we dissect the mechanisms of reprogramming influenced by fibrotic molecules including TGF-β signaling, mechanical signaling, inflammation signaling, epigenetic modifiers, and metabolic regulators. Innovative methods for fibroblast reprogramming like small molecules, CRISPRa, modified mRNA, and the challenges of cellular heterogeneity and senescence faced by in vivo direct reprogramming, are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.