ArticleBMC medicine2025
Development of an artificial intelligence-based multimodal diagnostic system for early detection of biliary atresia.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Comparative outcomes of open and laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary Atresia patients progressing to liver transplantation: A Real-World cohort study.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in pediatric general surgery: a systematic review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a screening model for early diagnosis of biliary atresia in neonates with cholestasis.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Strengthening collaboration within Europe: biliary atresia and the rise of the European Reference Networks.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA) is crucial for improving patient outcomes, yet remains a significant global challenge. This challenge may be ameliorated through the application of artificial intelligence (AI). Despite the promise of AI in medical diagnostics, its application to multimodal BA data has not yet achieved substantial breakthroughs. This study aims to leverage diverse data sources and formats to develop an intelligent diagnostic system for BA.
methodsWe constructed the largest known multimodal BA dataset, comprising ultrasound images, clinical data, and laboratory results. Using this dataset, we developed a novel deep learning model and simplified it using easily obtainable data, eliminating the need for blood samples. The models were externally validated in a prospective study. We compared the performance of our model with human experts of varying expertise levels and evaluated the AI system's potential to enhance its diagnostic accuracy.
resultsThe retrospective study included 1579 participants. The multimodal model achieved an AUC of 0.9870 on the internal test set, outperforming human experts. The simplified model yielded an AUC of 0.9799. In the prospective study's external test set of 171 cases, the multimodal model achieved an AUC of 0.9740, comparable to that of a radiologist with over 10 years of experience (AUC = 0.9766). For less experienced radiologists, the AI-assisted diagnostic AUC improved from 0.6667 to 0.9006.
conclusionsThis AI-based screening application effectively facilitates early diagnosis of BA and serves as a valuable reference for addressing common challenges in rare diseases. The model's high accuracy and its ability to enhance the diagnostic performance of human experts underscore its potential for significant clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.