ReviewDiagnostic pathology2025
Dedifferentiated liposarcoma with extensive cystic change causing significant diagnostic challenges: report of two cases and review of the literature.
Review in Diagnostic pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma is a rare, aggressive malignancy, characterized by high rates of recurrences and the potential for metastasis. On imaging, these tumors typically present as a solid mass with lipomatous and non-lipomatous components. Cystic changes of dedifferentiated liposarcomas is exceedingly rare and might pose significant diagnostic challenges, with only a few cases reported in the literature. REPORT OF 2 CASES: We here present two cases of retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma with a rare cystic presentation in two female patients aged 51 and 62 years. Imaging revealed large perinephric cystic masses measuring up to 13.0 cm and 16.1 cm, respectively, with calcifications of the cyst wall observed in the second case. Differential diagnoses included cystic echinococcosis, mesenchymal neoplasms, and benign cystic lesions (e.g. endometrial cyst). Both patients underwent upfront compartmental en-bloc surgical resection of the tumor mass and the kidney after multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) discussion. Macroscopically, the tumors were adherent to but sharply demarcated from the kidney. Histological examination of the first case revealed a small component of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) adjacent to a large non-lipogenic sarcoma with a prominent whirling pattern, compatible with dedifferentiation. The second case demonstrated a spindle cell neoplasm with prominent osteosarcomatous heterologous differentiation. MDM2 amplification was confirmed in both cases by molecular testing. No long-term follow-up data is available for either patient.
conclusionIn conclusion, these cases highlight the importance of recognizing unusual and extensive cystic changes of dedifferentiated liposarcoma, which can complicate the diagnostic work-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.