Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016737›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2025

Inferring protein from transcript abundances using convolutional neural networks.

Patrick Maximilian Schwehn, Pascal Falter-Braun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick Maximilian SchwehnInstitute of Network Biology (INET), Molecular Targets and Therapies Center (MTTC), Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Pascal Falter-BraunInstitute of Network Biology (INET), Molecular Targets and Therapies Center (MTTC), Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany. pascal.falter-braun@helmholtz-munich.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EA1803Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101003633Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101137201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough transcript abundance is often used as a proxy for protein abundance, it is an unreliable predictor. As proteins execute biological functions and their expression levels influence phenotypic outcomes, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict protein abundances from mRNA abundances, protein sequence, and mRNA sequence in Homo sapiens (H. sapiens) and the reference plant Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana).

resultsAfter hyperparameter optimization and initial data exploration, we implemented distinct training modules for value-based and sequence-based data. By analyzing the learned weights, we revealed common and organism-specific sequence features that influence protein-to-mRNA ratios (PTRs), including known and putative sequence motifs. Adding condition-specific protein interaction information identified genes correlated with many PTRs but did not improve predictions, likely due to insufficient data. The integrated model predicted protein abundance on unseen genes with a coefficient of determination (r

conclusionsFor H. sapiens, our model improves prediction performance by nearly 50% compared to previous sequence-based approaches, and for A. thaliana it represents the first model of its kind. The model's learned motifs recapitulate known regulatory elements, supporting its utility in systems-level and hypothesis-driven research approaches related to protein regulation.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksExplainable AIProtein-to-mRNA ratioRegression analysisTranslational regulation

Identifiers

PMID40016737
PMCPMC11866710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.