ArticleBioData mining2025
Inferring protein from transcript abundances using convolutional neural networks.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative transcriptomic profiling reveals metabolic and regulatory features of Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells relative to newly hatched larval tissues.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Neurotransmission Sex Dichotomy in the Rat Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus in Healthy and Infantile Spasm Model.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough transcript abundance is often used as a proxy for protein abundance, it is an unreliable predictor. As proteins execute biological functions and their expression levels influence phenotypic outcomes, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict protein abundances from mRNA abundances, protein sequence, and mRNA sequence in Homo sapiens (H. sapiens) and the reference plant Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana).
resultsAfter hyperparameter optimization and initial data exploration, we implemented distinct training modules for value-based and sequence-based data. By analyzing the learned weights, we revealed common and organism-specific sequence features that influence protein-to-mRNA ratios (PTRs), including known and putative sequence motifs. Adding condition-specific protein interaction information identified genes correlated with many PTRs but did not improve predictions, likely due to insufficient data. The integrated model predicted protein abundance on unseen genes with a coefficient of determination (r
conclusionsFor H. sapiens, our model improves prediction performance by nearly 50% compared to previous sequence-based approaches, and for A. thaliana it represents the first model of its kind. The model's learned motifs recapitulate known regulatory elements, supporting its utility in systems-level and hypothesis-driven research approaches related to protein regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.