ArticleBMC medical education2025
Can they blame it on the final? How does medical final exam and other factors shape specialty choice?
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical education in Poland consists of a six-year course, a 13-month postgraduate internship, and a Final Medical Examination. The possible further career path is to specialise in a particular field of medicine, and the choice of speciality is one of the most important decisions made by young doctors. Therefore, the decision-making process creates challenges. We conducted this study to determine the factors considered during the process of choosing a medical speciality and to investigate the influence of student performance in the Final Medical Examination on this choice.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted between 4 January and 7 February 2024. The data were collected via an online survey in Polish. The survey was disseminated to doctors engaged in postgraduate internships via social networks. The Chi-square test (χ
resultsThe survey included 336 postgraduate trainees. Internal medicine subspecialties, surgical specialities, and paediatrics were of most interest to the respondents. The average age of respondents was 26 years. In the multiple-choice question, most people (86.6%) marked their individual interests as a key factor influencing their choice of specialisation, followed by earning opportunities in the private sector (58%) and work-life balance (54.2%). The Final Medical Examination score is a significant factor in the selection of a speciality, as indicated by 68% of respondents.
conclusionsThe process of selecting a medical speciality involves overcoming numerous limitations. The outcome of the Final Medical Examination is a significant factor influencing the choice of future specialisation. Furthermore, the decision-making process is affected by several different factors and the distinctive complexities of practising a specific speciality within the Polish healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.