ArticleBMC nursing2025
Occupational violence against nursing staff in the surgical wards of Murzuq locality hospitals, Libya (2024).
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of violence on emotional exhaustion risk of registered nurses in Germany: a Bayesian analysis of cross-Sectional data with multiple imputations.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Surgical nurses' perceptions of patient aggression and exposure to workplace violence: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccupational violence is a significant issue for nurses worldwide, impacting their well-being, job satisfaction, and patient care quality. This study investigated the prevalence, types, and effects of such violence on nursing staff in surgical wards in Murzuq locality hospitals, Libya, to inform effective prevention strategies.
methodsThis cross-sectional study examined occupational violence against nursing staff in surgical wards across three hospitals in Murzuq, Libya. Using a convenience sampling approach, data were collected from 50 nurses in general surgical and emergency surgical wards over four weeks through a self-administered questionnaire. The variables included demographic data (gender, experience) and information on violence types, sources, impacts, and reduction strategies. The data were analysed via SPSS v27, with descriptive statistics applied. For inferential statistics, the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were conducted at a significance level of 0.05. Ethical approval was obtained from the academic research committee of Fezzan University, and informed consent was secured from all participants.
resultsVerbal insults (60%) and discrimination (64%) were the most reported types of violence. Patient companions (68%) were identified as the primary source, followed by patients (40%) and colleagues (28%). Occupational violence significantly impacted nurses' lives, with 62% reporting stress, 48% experiencing decreased job satisfaction, and 28% considering leaving their jobs. Additionally, 40% reported difficulty concentrating due to violence. Significant associations were found between gender and sources of violence (p ≤ 0.001) and between years of experience and types, sources, and impacts of violence (p ≤ 0.001).
conclusionThese findings underscore the need for gender-sensitive interventions, comprehensive training, and support mechanisms to address workplace violence. Future research should explore the long-term effects of violence on nursing staff and the effectiveness of tailored interventions in different healthcare settings. The results highlight the critical role of improving work conditions and organizational policies to enhance workplace safety for nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.