Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016682›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

The families SHARE project: novel insights on recruiting and engaging Black men in a community-based genomic education program.

Julia R Nummelin, Jama J Brookes, Raegan A Bishop, Calandra G Whitted, Chiranjeev Dash, Laura M Koehly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia R NummelinSocial Network Methods Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. julianummelin@gmail.com.
Jama J BrookesSocial Network Methods Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Raegan A BishopSocial Network Methods Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Calandra G WhittedSocial Network Methods Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Chiranjeev DashOffice of Minority Health & Health Disparities Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Laura M KoehlySocial Network Methods Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS S NOEL · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
The influence of familial social context on risk dissemination and copingZIAHG200335 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KOEHLY, LAURA M · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200335NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NHGRI NIH HHS ZIAHG200335NIH HHS P30-CA051008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlack Americans are disproportionately affected by a number of common complex conditions, such as cancer. Genomic tools like Family Health History (FHH) can be useful in guiding screening and behavior based on a person's risk for these conditions. Factors such as family communication and societal norms can influence individuals' knowledge of their FHH. Men, particularly Black men, are less likely than women to know FHH. Further, there is limited understanding of Black men's participation in FHH dissemination, as they are often underrepresented in biomedical research. Understanding Black men's perceptions of FHH sharing may help guide effective recruitment and retention efforts in future genomic research providing an opportunity to investigate their lack of engagement in FHH conversations.

aimsThe purpose of this paper was two-fold: (1) Detail methods that were effective in recruiting and retaining Black men in community-based genomic research interventions, and (2) Evaluate the factors influencing men's participation in FHH gathering and sharing.

methodsThis one-year, mixed methods study combined qualitative community-based education programs (n = 12) and semi-structured interviews (n = 27), with quantitative survey assessing participant characteristics and sex differences (n = 50). Transcripts from the program were coded by separate study team members for themes and provided insights into study participants' perceptions about FHH and their involvement in gathering and disseminating this information within their family.

resultsChallenges in recruiting and retaining Black men prompted the study team to pivot recruitment strategies, including partnering with community-based organizations focused on men's health, growing the research team to include Black men, adapting to potential participants' time constraints, and creating opportunities to build trust. A thematic analysis of community education sessions and interviews identified five themes, including social role expectations and perceived family disconnectedness, that provide insights into potential barriers to participation. Qualitative data from participants suggests that beliefs and perceptions about the roles Black men play in health discussions within the family may influence their involvement, while community programs were seen as encouraging men to engage in these conversations.

conclusionThese lessons learned provide valuable perspectives on potential barriers to participation, which may inform future strategies that aim to engage Black men in family-oriented community education programs and genomic research.

Indexed as

Family HealthGenomicsHealth EducationPatient SelectionAdultBlack or African AmericanHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchBlack communitiesFamily health historyGenomics educationMinority health

Identifiers

PMID40016682
PMCPMC11869665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.