Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016664›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Early versus delayed mobilisation for non-surgically treated proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Dimitris Challoumas, Haroon Minhas, Stephanie Bagni, Neal Millar

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dimitris ChalloumasSchool of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. dchalloumas@hotmail.co.uk.
Haroon MinhasSchool of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Stephanie BagniSchool of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Neal MillarSchool of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are among the commonest bony injuries and the majority of them can be managed non-surgically. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness and safety of early versus delayed mobilisation in conservatively treated PHFs.

methodsA literature search was performed in Medline, EMBASE and clinicaltrials.gov in Januray 2025 aiming to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early versus delayed (conventional) mobilisation as part of the non-surgical management of PHFs. Primary outcomes were patient-reported function and pain at short-term (3 months), mid-term (6 months) and long-term (12 months) follow-up, and secondary outcomes included secondary fracture displacement and total complications. Meta-analyses produced mean differences (MDs) or standardised MDs (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool. Recommendations for clinical practice were given only based on results of high or moderate certainty of evidence.

resultsSix (6) RCTs were included that compared early mobilisation (EM; within one week from injury) to delayed mobilisation (DM; after 3 or 4 weeks of immobilisation) with a total of 470 patients with PHFs. There were no differences in patient-reported function (combined or Constant score) or pain between the EM and DM groups at any follow-up time points except for a significant difference in combined function scores favouring EM [SMD 0.4 CI (0.1,0.7), P = 0.006] at 3 months follow-up. There were no significant differences in the incidence of secondary fracture displacement and total complications in the two groups [OR 3.5 CI (0.7,18.2), P > 0.05, and OR 1.2 CI (0.5,2.9), P > 0.05, respectively]. All results were based on moderate or high strength of evidence. The most significant limitations of our study were the small number of pooled studies and inability to perform subgroup analyses for specific fracture types.

conclusionsOur meta-analysis of RCTs showed that commencement of mobilisation within one week from injury for non-surgically managed PHFs is safe and may confer short-term functional benefits compared to delayed mobilisation.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentEarly AmbulationShoulder FracturesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCollar and cuffConservativeFragility fractureRehabilitationSling

Identifiers

PMID40016664
PMCPMC11866563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.