ArticleBMC public health2025
Association between dietary coenzyme Q10 intake and hyperuricemia in Chinese adults: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the protective effects of coenzyme Q10 on female fertility.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe association of food-sourced Coenzyme Q10(CoQ10) intake with hyperuricemia (HUA) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between dietary CoQ10 intake and HUA among Chinese adults.
methodsA total of 7953 Chinese adults from the 2009 China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) were included in the present cross-sectional. Dietary CoQ10 was assessed by 3 consecutive 24-h dietary recall interviews combined with a household food inventory. Multivariable logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline models were used to explore the associations between dietary CoQ10 and HUA.
resultsIn an adjusted logistic regression model, the multivariable odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for HUA in the highest versus the lowest quartile of total, animal-based, and plant-based CoQ10 intake were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.70), 1.46 (95% CI: 1.20 to 1.78), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.97), respectively. Dose-response analyses revealed similar linear patterns, with the exception of plant-derived CoQ10, which did not reach statistical significance (p for nonlinearity = 0.09). In stratified analysis, there were no significant interactions between sex, age, BMI, smoking status, drinking status and total dietary CoQ10 intake in relation to the HUA (All p for interaction > 0.05).
conclusionsOur study documented a novel positive association between total dietary CoQ10 intake and HUA, with similar trends for animal-derived CoQ10 and an inverse trend for plant-derived CoQ10.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.