Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016581›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2025

Lurcher Mouse as a Model of Cerebellar Syndromes.

Nilpawan Roy Choudhury, Pascal Hilber, Jan Cendelin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nilpawan Roy ChoudhuryDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Pascal HilberUniv Rouen Normandie, Inserm, Normandie Univ, CBG UMR 1245 NeuroGlio Team, Rouen, France.
Jan CendelinDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. jan.cendelin@lfp.cuni.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar extinction lesions can manifest themselves with cerebellar motor and cerebellar cognitive affective syndromes. For investigation of the functions of the cerebellum and the pathogenesis of cerebellar diseases, particularly hereditary neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias, various cerebellar mutant mice are used. The Lurcher mouse is a model of selective olivocerebellar degeneration with early onset and rapid progress. These mice show both motor deficits as well as cognitive and behavioral changes i.e., pathological phenotype in the functional domains affected in cerebellar patients. Therefore, Lurcher mice might be considered as a tool to investigate the mechanisms of functional impairments caused by cerebellar degenerative diseases. There are, however, limitations due to the particular features of the neurodegenerative process and a lack of possibilities to examine some processes in mice. The main advantage of Lurcher mice would be the expected absence of significant neuropathologies outside the olivocerebellar system that modify the complex behavioral phenotype in less selective models. However, detailed examinations and further thorough validation of the model are needed to verify this assumption.

Indexed as

Cerebellar DiseasesDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsCerebellumHumansMiceMice, Neurologic MutantsAtaxiaCerebellar Cognitive Affective SyndromeCerebellumLurcher MouseValidity

Identifiers

PMID40016581
PMCPMC11868327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.