Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016580›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Factors Affecting the Choice of Cosmetic Forehead and/or Eyebrow Lift Technique: An Oculofacial Plastic Surgeon's Perspective.

Jack E Feist, Mohsen B Kashkouli, S Elizabeth Dugan, Nita Bhat, Christopher J Compton, Jeremy D Clark

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jack E FeistDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Mohsen B KashkouliDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA. mkashkouli2@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-5549
S Elizabeth DuganDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Nita BhatDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Christopher J ComptonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Jeremy D ClarkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.

objectivesTo compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.

methodsThis is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.

resultsThere were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.

conclusionEndoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

EyebrowsForeheadRhytidoplastyAdultAgedCohort StudiesEndoscopyEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRejuvenationRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentDirect eyebrow liftEndoscopic eyebrow liftEndoscopic forehead liftForehead and eyebrow liftingUpper face rejuvenation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.