ArticleEndocrine2025
Exploring the non-linear association and threshold effect of sedentary behavior on testosterone deficiency.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physical activity, sedentary behavior and ovarian cancer risk in Asian populations: a scoping review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Context-dependent effects of whole-body vibration on reproductive function and penile tissue integrity in sedentary male rats.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Unmasking Masculinity: Biological, Behavioral, and Social Determinants of Testosterone Deficiency in U.S. Men, 2011-2023.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSedentary behavior has emerged as a potential risk factor for various health issues, including hormonal imbalances like testosterone deficiency (TD). However, the relationship between sedentary time and TD remains underexplored, especially with respect to the complex biological mechanisms underlying this association. This study aimed to examine the association between sedentary time and TD in adult males.
methodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2016. A total of 6057 male participants aged 20 years and older were included. Sedentary time was categorized into quartiles, and TD was defined as serum testosterone levels below 300 ng/dL. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between sedentary time and TD, adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and health-related covariates. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis and segmented regression were also conducted to explore potential non-linear relationships and thresholds. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the consistency of associations across various groups.
resultsThe analysis revealed a significant positive association between sedentary time and TD. Prolonged sedentary behaviour was consistently associated with higher odds of TD across all models (all p < 0.001). RCS analysis showed a significant non-linear relationship, particularly as sedentary time exceeded 4.5 h per day, with a marked increase in the likelihood of TD (p-non-linear = 0.027). Subgroup analysis indicated that this association was most pronounced in Non-Hispanic Whites, current smokers, and drinkers, and was weaker in individuals with diabetes, where the association lost statistical significance after full adjustment.
conclusionsThis study identifies a significant association between prolonged sedentary behaviour and a higher risk of TD, suggesting that sedentary behavior may play a key role in the development of TD, particularly in specific high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40016569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.