Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016526›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Alzheimer's disease biological PET staging using plasma p217+tau.

Azadeh Feizpour, Vincent Doré, Natasha Krishnadas, Pierrick Bourgeat, James D Doecke, Ziad S Saad, Gallen Triana-Baltzer, Simon M Laws, Rosita Shishegar, Kun Huang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Azadeh FeizpourFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0826-4011
Vincent DoréDepartment of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8051-0558
Natasha KrishnadasFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Pierrick BourgeatThe Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
James D DoeckeThe Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2863-0293
Ziad S SaadNeuroscience Biomarkers, Janssen Research and Development, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Gallen Triana-BaltzerNeuroscience Biomarkers, Janssen Research and Development, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Simon M LawsCentre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-7082
Rosita ShishegarThe Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kun HuangDepartment of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Christopher FowlerFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Larry WardFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Colin L MastersFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jurgen FrippThe Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Hartmuth C KolbNeuroscience Biomarkers, Janssen Research and Development, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-5792
Victor L VillemagneDepartment of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Christopher C RoweFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. christopher.rowe@austin.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-2453

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1132604Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1140853Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1152623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlasma phospho-tau biomarkers, such as p217+tau, excel at identifying Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology. However, their ability to substitute for tau PET to identify AD biological stage is unclear.

methodsParticipants included 248 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 227 cognitively impaired (CI) individuals, with Janssen plasma p217+tau Simoa® assay,

resultsPlasma p217+tau concentrations increase across the AD biological PET stages, except between Initial and Early stages. Screening for all AD stages (vs. A-T-), combined Intermediate/Advanced stages, or Advanced stage yields AUC of 0.92, 0.92, and 0.91, respectively (CI only: AUC 0.93, 0.89, 0.83). Plasma p217+tau Youden threshold provides sensitivity of 0.77 [0.73-0.90], specificity 0.91 [0.80-0.95], PPV 0.84 [0.71-0.89], and NPV 0.88 [0.85-0.93] for combined Intermediate/Advanced stages. For the Advanced stage alone, sensitivity is 0.89 [0.79-0.97], specificity 0.82 [0.75-0.9], NPV 0.99 [0.98-1.0], but PPV is only 0.33 [0.25-0.47].

conclusionsIn addition to accurately screening for A+ individuals, plasma p217+tau is useful for identifying a combined Intermediate/Advanced stage AD cohort or pre-screening to reduce the tau-PET required to identify Advanced stage AD individuals.

Identifiers

PMID40016526
PMCPMC11868538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.