ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025
Melphalan-based conditioning with post-transplant cyclophosphamide for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: donor effect.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of early tacrolimus initiation in haploidentical-PBSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide after melphalan-based conditioning regimen.Blood cell therapy · 2025Article
- Medicinal chemistry perspectives on anticancer drug design based on clinical applications (2015-2025).RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fludarabine and melphalan (FM) conditioning offers effective disease control with an acceptable toxicity profile. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has improved transplant outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving FM-based transplants with PTCy at City of Hope. Of 248 patients included, 89 (35.9%) received hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) from a matched related/unrelated donor (MRD/MUD), 118 (47.6%) from a haploidentical (HID) donor, and 49 (19.8%) from a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD). There were no differences in acute and chronic GVHD based on donor type. The 2-year overall survival (OS) for patients receiving HID, MMUD, and MRD/MUD was 58%, 55%, and 70%; disease-free survival (DFS) was 52%, 48%, and 66%; and graft-versus-host/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 48%, 40%, and 59%, respectively. OS, DFS, and GRFS were similar regardless of donor type on multivariable analysis. However, donor age ≥35 years was associated with lower OS and GRFS and higher 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) on multivariable analysis across all patients, regardless of donor type. FM with PTCy appears to produce similar outcomes between MRD/MUD, MMUD, and HID when adjusting for donors <35 years, and donor age seems to be the most important factor when selecting a donor with this regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.