ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting cardiac frequencies in mammals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We develop a fluid mechanical model of the arterial tree in order to address the key question of what determines heart rate in mammals. We propose that the frequency of the pulsatile pressure gradient, which minimizes resistance to flow and facilitates fluid movement, coincides with the physiological heart rate. Using data from the literature on heart rate in 95 mammals as a function of body mass, and the radius of the aorta as a function of body mass, we construct a target curve of cardiac frequency versus aortic radius. This curve serves as a benchmark for comparison with our model's results. Our elastic one-dimensional model for pulsatile arterial flow, combined with experimental rheological data for human blood, enables us to calculate the frequency that minimizes flow resistance, which we express as a function of a characteristic vascular scale, in this case, the aorta radius. We find a reasonable agreement with the target curve, confirming a scaling law with the observed exponent for mammals ranging in size from ferrets to elephants. Our model provides a plausible explanation for the resting heart rate frequency in healthy mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.