ArticleScientific reports2025
Incorporation of CuO on the αFe
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pomegranate peel-derived Cu/hydrochar nanocomposites: a sustainable catalyst for biodiesel production via oleic acid esterification.BMC chemistry · 2026Article
- Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metal Oxide-Modified Aluminosilicate and Zeolitic Ceramic Catalysts for Sustainable Biodiesel Production: A Review.ChemPlusChem · 2026Review
- Synthesis and characterization of FeCuAlOScientific reports · 2025Article
- Upgrading of NiFeScientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing diesel engine efficiency with waste cooking oil biodiesel and nano additives for sustainable fuel applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focused on generating biodiesel from waste cooking oil (WCO) employing an αFe₂O₃/CuO nanocatalyst synthesized via a co-precipitation method. Several characterization techniques, including FTIR, XRD, SEM-EDX, BET, and TEM analyses, were applied to scrutinize the features of the fabricated nanocatalyst. The results confirmed the successful incorporation of CuO into the αFe₂O₃ structure. BET analysis further revealed that the addition of CuO nanoparticles significantly enhanced the catalyst's surface properties, increasing the number of active sites available for transesterification reactions. Besides, the αFe₂O₃/CuO nanocatalyst exhibited a specific surface area of 334 m²/g, highlighting its high surface availability for catalytic activity. The process was statistically optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) with a Box-Behnken design (BBD) to assess the influence of critical reaction parameters. Vital parameters evaluated included temperature (50-70 °C), methanol/WCO molar ratio (8-14 mol/mol), and catalyst loading (1-3 wt%). Moreover, ANOVA results indicated that the methanol/WCO molar proportion had the most remarkable effect on biodiesel production efficiency, with an F-value of 337.11. Under optimal conditions reaction time of 3 h, methanol/WCO molar ratio of 11, αFe₂O₃/CuO dosage of 2 wt%, and temperature of 60 °C a highest biodiesel yield of 94.27% was achieved. Additionally, the reusability assessment of the αFe₂O₃/CuO nanocatalyst demonstrated notable stability, with only a 12% reduction in efficiency observed over seven cycles. This research demonstrates that αFe₂O₃/CuO nanocatalysts, owing to their unique properties, have the potential to serve as highly effective heterogeneous catalysts for transesterification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.