ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
The surgical technique and efficacy of a novel pure retroperitoneoscopic extravesical bladder cuff excision without intraoperative repositioning for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and therapeutic outcomes of a novel pure retroperitoneoscopic extravesical bladder cuff excision (PREBE) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a retrospectively comparative study between PREBE and traditional laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (TLNU) was done in a single center. We retrospectively evaluated 72 patients diagnosed with UTUC at our hospital from January 2022 to January 2024. The patients who underwent TLNU (n = 35) and PREBE (n = 37) were consecutively enrolled. The kidney and bladder cuff were retroperitoneoscopically dissected and the bladder was repaired with needle sutures under retroperitoneoscopic in the PREBE group. Demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups. Both procedures were performed effectively in 72 patients without converting to open surgery. The PREBE group exhibited shorter mean operative time (P < 0.01), less mean estimated blood loss (EBL) (P < 0.01), shorter median drainage tube removal time, shorter median first postoperative defecation (FPD) time (P < 0.01) and shorter median postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.01). However, there was no statistical difference in postoperative pathological results or in the incidence of intravesical recurrence between the two groups. The mean follow-up time was 13.8 months for the PREBE group and 14.4 months for the TLNU group. The PREBE is a safe and effective treatment for patients with UTUC, avoiding intraoperative patient repositioning while offering better perioperative outcomes to those of traditional techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.