ReviewOncogene2025
The epigenetic landscape of brain metastasis.
Review in Oncogene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA as a prognostic and disease-activity biomarker in leptomeningeal metastases: systematic review, meta-analysis, and implications for CSF-guided care.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Neural-tumor interactions: bidirectional regulatory mechanisms and nervous system-targeted tumor therapeutic strategies.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Metastatic Cancers Exploit Vagal Sensory Neurons and Neural Repair Programs to Colonize New Tissues.Research square · 2026Article
- Brain Cancer: Molecular Alterations and Emerging Trends in Neuropharmacology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Astrocyte-associated immunosuppressive programs in brain tumors: a STAT3-centered perspective.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Circadian Regulation of m6A RNA Methylation in Migraine: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Review
- DNA Methylation, Aging, and Cancer.Epigenomes · 2025Review
- Beyond the genome: epigenetic regulation of immune responses and T cells in brain tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain metastasis represents a significant challenge in oncology, driven by complex molecular and epigenetic mechanisms that distinguish it from primary tumors. While recent research has focused on identifying genomic mutation drivers with potential clinical utility, these strategies have not pinpointed specific genetic mutations responsible for site-specific metastasis to the brain. It is now clear that successful brain colonization by metastatic cancer cells requires intricate interactions with the brain tumor ecosystem and the acquisition of specialized molecular traits that facilitate their adaptation to this highly selective environment. This is best exemplified by widespread transcriptional adaptation during brain metastasis, resulting in aberrant gene programs that promote extravasation, seeding, and colonization of the brain. Increasing evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms play a significant role in shaping these pro-brain metastasis traits. This review explores dysregulated chromatin patterns driven by chromatin remodeling, histone modifications, DNA/RNA methylation, and other epigenetic regulators that underpin brain metastatic seeding, initiation, and outgrowth. We provide novel insights into how these epigenetic modifications arise within both the brain metastatic tumor and the surrounding brain metastatic tumor ecosystem. Finally, we discuss how the inherent plasticity and reversibility of the epigenomic landscape in brain metastases may offer new therapeutic opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.