Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016463›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

In Vivo Model to Assess the Nasal Infection by Minor Group Rhinovirus.

Umadevi Sajjan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Umadevi SajjanCentre for Inflammation and Lung Research, Lewis Katz Medical School, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. uma.sajjan@temple.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhinovirus primarily infects humans via nasal epithelial cells and is spread through the inhalation of shed progeny virus via micro-droplets containing the virus. A handful of studies have investigated the nasal mucosal responses to rhinovirus in experimentally infected healthy volunteers. There are also studies that have investigated the effect of antiviral drugs in reducing symptoms induced by rhinovirus infection. It is extremely expensive to test the antiviral drugs in human volunteers, and therefore having preclinical in vivo models is necessary to confirm the antiviral effect of the drugs prior to conducting clinical trials. The existing in vivo models for RV infection are focused on lung inflammation, which may be relevant to patients with chronic lung diseases, in whom rhinovirus causes lower respiratory tract infections. In this chapter, we describe a mouse model of rhinovirus infection, which shows self-limiting inflammation of the sinonasal mucosa.

Indexed as

Nasal MucosaPicornaviridae InfectionsRhinovirusAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceInflammationInterferonMucus secretionTight junctions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.