ArticleBJC reports2025
Activation of FGFR genes by genetic and epigenetic alterations in uterine leiomyomas.
Article in BJC reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mutated FGFR1 is an oncogenic driver and therapeutic target in high-risk neuroblastoma.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Optical Genome Mapping versus Whole-Genome Sequencing in the Clinical Diagnosis of Gynecologic Mesenchymal Tumors.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2026Article
- Stem cell activation in organ culture reveals novel transcriptional programs underlying metabolic, fibrotic, vascular, and immune dysregulation in uterine leiomyomas.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFibroblast growth factor 1-4 (FGFR1-4) are well-known oncogenic drivers in many cancer types. Here, we studied the role of FGFRs in uterine leiomyoma (UL) that is a benign neoplasm arising from the myometrium and the most common tumour in women. Although ULs can be classified to molecular subtypes based on genetic drivers, potential secondary drivers are not well characterised.
methodsWe performed mutation analysis of RNA-sequencing data of ULs, followed by screening of FGFR alterations in our Finnish (n = 2677) and Swedish (n = 372) UL collections, utilising Sanger-, next-generation and Nanopore sequencing and SNP array data. The role of FGFR genes in UL predisposition was examined by GWAS.
resultsWe identified FGFR activation in a subset of ULs on both genetic and epigenetic levels. In addition to single-nucleotide mutations in FGFR1/2, we detected an FGFR2-ERC1 fusion gene, FGFR1 gains and hypomethylation of regulatory regions of FGFR2/3. FGFR alterations were enriched in molecularly similar HMGA2, HMGA1 and PLAG1 UL subtypes. We also unveil a UL predisposing variant upstream of FGFR4 associated with increased expression in both normal myometrium and ULs.
conclusionsOur results establish the role of FGFR signalling in the genesis of UL.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.