ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence models predicting abnormal uterine bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid deployment of COVID-19 vaccines has necessitated the ongoing surveillance of adverse events, with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) emerging as a reported concern in vaccinated females. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict post-vaccination AUB in women aged less than 50 years. A large-scale national cohort, the Korean Nationwide Cohort (K-COV-N cohort), was utilized, comprising over 7 million participants. The study employed advanced ML techniques, including ensemble models combining gradient boosting machine and logistic regression, and conducted feature importance analysis. The dataset was meticulously curated, focusing on relevant demographics and variables, and balanced using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Using a national cohort of over 2 million COVID-19 vaccinated cases in South Korea, we developed a ML model for AUB prediction. Our study is the first to develop a predictive model for post-vaccination AUB, employing feature importance analysis to identify the key contributing factors. The analysis revealed three primary predictive features: COVID-19 vaccination frequency, NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax) COVID-19 vaccination count, and hemoglobin levels. These findings provide valuable insights into predicting the risk AUB following COVID-19 vaccination, potentially enhancing post-vaccination monitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.