Trial reportScientific reports2025
Syntonic phototherapy versus part time occlusion for treatment of refractive amblyopia.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Research hotspots and trends of amblyopia treatment from 2015 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs on Efficacy of Conventional vs. Emerging Treatments for Amblyopia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cone-Specific Filter-Based Neuromodulation: A Proposed Clinical Framework for Amblyopia, Strabismus, and ADHD.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness of syntonic phototherapy and compare it with partial time occlusion to improve visual acuity in cases of refractive amblyopia. This study is a prospective, comparative, and randomized study. It included 40 patients. Their mean age ± SD was 14.45 ± 10.03 years (Range: 6-45 years). Twenty patients were subjected to partial time occlusion of the sound eye, and 20 received syntonic phototherapy treatment.The study revealed that there was statistically significant improvement in visual functions, UCVA, BCVA, AOP, and functional visual field in patients who were subjected to syntonic phototherapy, whereas the improvement of UCVA and BCVA in patients who were subjected to conventional treatment was satisfactory but less than that reported by syntonic therapy. Visual acuity increased significantly in patients with amblyopia after syntonic phototherapy as compared to partial occlusion therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.