ArticleEuropean radiology2025
AI-powered prostate cancer detection: a multi-centre, multi-scanner validation study.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the radiologic diagnosis of major urological cancers: a meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence studies for prostate cancer detection on MRI.European radiology · 2026Article
- Current status and future directions of AI in prostate cancer detection on MRI: a special report from the ESUR prostate MRI working group authors.European radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of AI-powered prostate MRI against biopsy ground truth: quasi-continuous risk scoring versus fixed PI-RADS thresholds.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of bpMRI versus mpMRI and AI-assisted bpMRI in prostate cancer detection: a multi-reader study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based prostate cancer diagnosis on MRI with hip prostheses: artifact and sequence effects.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- AI decision support for increasing prostate biopsy efficiency: a retrospective multicentre, multiscanner study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Prostate cancer detection using modified transformer with optimal feature selection from MRI images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prioritising Data Quality Governance for AI in Prostate Cancer: A Methodological Proof-of-Concept Study Using Neural Networks for Risk Stratification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of AI for prostate cancer detection in biparametric-MRI screening population data.European radiology · 2026Article
- Deep-learning computer-aided detection and classification of prostate lesions on biparametric MRI: comparison with expert readers.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Concurrent AI-human interaction in prostate cancer MRI interpretation: More hype than help?European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prostate MRI: Comparison of an AI-Based Software and an Experienced Radiologist for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Modern integrative prostate cancer diagnostics.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in urological malignancy diagnosis and prognosis: current status and future prospects.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Confidence-based classification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI using Monte Carlo dropout and Grad-CAM visualization.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Radiologists in MRI-Based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Meta-Analysis of Accuracy and Effectiveness.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in multidisciplinary tumor boards enhancing decision making and clinical outcomes in oncology.iScience · 2025Review
- A Multi-Stage Hybrid Learning Model with Advanced Feature Fusion for Enhanced Prostate Cancer Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMulti-centre, multi-vendor validation of artificial intelligence (AI) software to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is lacking. We compared a new AI solution, validated on a separate dataset from different UK hospitals, to the original multidisciplinary team (MDT)-supported radiologist's interpretations. MATERIALS AND
methodsA Conformité Européenne (CE)-marked deep-learning (DL) computer-aided detection (CAD) medical device (Pi) was trained to detect Gleason Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2 cancer using retrospective data from the PROSTATEx dataset and five UK hospitals (793 patients). Our separate validation dataset was on six machines from two manufacturers across six sites (252 patients). Data included in the study were from MRI scans performed between August 2018 to October 2022. Patients with a negative MRI who did not undergo biopsy were assumed to be negative (90.4% had prostate-specific antigen density < 0.15 ng/mL
resultsGG ≥ 2 prevalence in the validation set was 31%. Evaluated per patient, Pi was non-inferior to radiologists (considering a 10% performance difference as acceptable), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 vs. 0.95. At the predetermined risk threshold of 3.5, the AI software's sensitivity was 95% and specificity 67%, while radiologists at Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data Systems/Likert ≥ 3 identified GG ≥ 2 with a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 73%. AI performed well per-site (AUC ≥ 0.83) at the patient-level independent of scanner age and field strength.
conclusionReal-world data testing suggests that Pi matches the performance of MDT-supported radiologists in GG ≥ 2 PCa detection and generalises to multiple sites, scanner vendors, and models. KEY POINTS: QuestionThe performance of artificial intelligence-based medical tools for prostate MRI has yet to be evaluated on multi-centre, multi-vendor data to assess generalisability. FindingsA dedicated AI medical tool matches the performance of multidisciplinary team-supported radiologists in prostate cancer detection and generalises to multiple sites and scanners. Clinical relevanceThis software has the potential to support the MRI process for biopsy decision-making and target identification, but future prospective studies, where lesions identified by artificial intelligence are biopsied separately, are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.