ArticleScientific reports2025
Using machine learning to predict deterioration of symptoms in COPD patients within a telemonitoring program.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI and Internet of Things for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Remote Monitoring: Systematic Review of Exacerbation Prediction and Key Physiological Variables.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Machine Learning, Clinical Summary Notes, and Vital Signs: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in the United States.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Approaches to Forecast Physical and Mental Deterioration During Chemotherapy in Patients with Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
COPD exacerbations have a profound clinical impact on patients. Accurately predicting these events could help healthcare professionals take proactive measures to mitigate their impact. For over a decade, telEPOC, a telehealthcare program, has collected data that can be utilized to train machine learning models to anticipate COPD exacerbations. The objective of this study is to develop a machine learning model that, based on a patient's history, predicts the probability of an exacerbation event within the next 3 days. After cleaning and harmonizing the different subsets of data, we split the data along the temporal axis: one subset for model training, another for model selection, and another for model evaluation. We then trained a gradient tree boosting approach as well as neural network-based approaches. After conducting our analysis, we found that the CatBoost algorithm yielded the best results, with an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.53 and an area under the ROC curve of 0.91. Additionally, we assessed the significance of the input variables and discovered that breathing rate, heart rate, and SpO2 were the most informative. The resulting model can operate in a 50% recall and 50% precision regime, which we consider has the potential to be useful in daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.