Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016276›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Resistance development in pink bollworm (Pectinophora Gossypiella Saunders) against Bt cotton and its' establishment as mid season pest in India.

Rishi Kumar, B V Bhede, Debashis Paul, N K Bhute, Prashant Patil, R D Patel, M V Variya, S G Hanchinal, Poornima V Matti, Shivaray Navi and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Rishi KumarICAR-CICR, Regional Station,, Sirsa, India.
B V BhedeCotton Research Station, Nanded, VNMKV, Parbhani, India. bvb1093@gmail.com.
Debashis PaulICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station, Sirsa, India.
N K BhuteAICRP, MPKV, Rahuri, India.
Prashant PatilAICRP on Cotton, CRU, Dr. PDKV, Akola, India.
R D PatelMCRS, NAU, Surat, India.
M V VariyaCRS, JAU, Junagadh, India.
S G HanchinalAICRP on Cotton, MARS, Raichur, India.
Poornima V MattiARS Dharwad, Dharwad, India.
Shivaray NaviAICRP on Cotton, Chamarajanagara, India.
Anil JakharCOA, CCS HAU, Hisar, India.
Jasjinder KaurAICRP on Cotton, RRS, Bathinda, India.
Roop Singh MeenaSKNRAU, Bikaner, India.
Jyoti Rekha MallickAICRP on Cotton, RRTTS, Kalahandi, India.
Satnam SinghPunjab Agricultural University Regional Research Station Faridkot, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
N ChitraTamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
G Annie Diana GraceRegional Agricultural Research Station, Guntur, India.
R K KalyanAgricultural Research Station, Banswara, India.
M Sivarama KrishnaRegional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyal, Kurnool, India.
G T BehereAICRP on Cotton and Head Crop Protection Divison, ICAR-CICR Nagpur, Nagpur, India.
A H PrakashICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station, Coimbatore, India.
Y G PrasadICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pink boll worm now became a menace for sustainable cultivation of Bt cotton in India. Based on the data recorded in unsprayed conditions at 13 different locations of north, central and south cotton growing zone between 2007 and 2023, initiation of green boll damage during later part of the season was observed on Bt cotton genotype during 2009-2014 wherein incidence of PBW already existed on non-Bt genotype. In our research, between 2014 and 2017, the central and southern regions of India experienced a rise in the survival of pink bollworms on Bt cotton surpassing the Economic Threshold Level (ETL) whereas in the north zone PBW incidence started in 2018 at experimental locations. The data validate the initial success of Bt/BG-II cotton in its first ten years (2002-2013) of introduction including pink bollworm, which caused negligible green boll damage (0-1.03%) on Bt/BG-II genotypes, while the incidence on non-Bt genotypes was much higher (2.5-23.01%). Following that, an establishment phase was detected in 2014, confirmed by the equal presence of pink boll worm in BG-II and non-Bt, with minimal infestation differences in BG-II and non-Bt, indicating a larger presence of resistant individuals. Following 2014, the coexistence of PBW in BG-II and non-Bt populations was noted concurrently, with a gradual increase in incidence over ETL beginning in the middle of the season. Farmer's field surveys reported highest number of locations above ETL during 2017 with a decreasing trend both in central and south zone. In the north, infestations were low until 2021, but increased significantly, reaching their highest point in 2023. The emergence and spread of PBW resistance to Bt cotton, facilitated by off-season survival and carryover, poses a substantial threat to the sustainability of BG-II cotton cultivation in India.

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensisGossypiumInsecticide ResistanceMothsPest Control, BiologicalPlants, Genetically ModifiedAnimalsBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsEndotoxinsGenotypeIndiaSeasonsBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsEndotoxinsCottonCry proteinPink bollwormResistance developmentSMW

Identifiers

PMID40016276
PMCPMC11868544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.