ArticleScientific reports2025
Detection of human activities using multi-layer convolutional neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust Activity Recognition via Redundancy-Aware CNNs and Novel Pooling for Noisy Mobile Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence and wearable devices in volleyball.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- AIoT-Based Eyelash Extension Durability Evaluation Using LabVIEW Data Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intelligent routing for human activity recognition in wireless body area networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) plays a critical role in fields such as healthcare, sports, and human-computer interaction. However, achieving high accuracy and robustness remains a challenge, particularly when dealing with noisy sensor data from accelerometers and gyroscopes. This paper introduces HARCNN, a novel approach leveraging Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to extract hierarchical spatial and temporal features from raw sensor data, enhancing activity recognition performance. The HARCNN model is designed with 10 convolutional blocks, referred to as "ConvBlk." Each block integrates a convolutional layer, a ReLU activation function, and a batch normalization layer. The outputs from specific blocks "ConvBlk_3 and ConvBlk_4," "ConvBlk_6 and ConvBlk_7," and "ConvBlk_9 and ConvBlk_10" are fused using a depth concatenation approach. The concatenated outputs are subsequently passed through a 2 × 2 max-pooling layer with a stride of 2 for further processing. The proposed HARCNN framework is evaluated using accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and f-score as key metrics, reflecting the model's ability to correctly classify and differentiate between human activities. The proposed model's performance is compared to traditional pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and other state-of-the-art techniques. By leveraging advanced feature extraction and optimized learning strategies, the proposed model demonstrates its efficacy in achieving accuracy of 97.87%, 99.12%, 96.58%, and 98.51% for various human activities datasets; UCI-HAR, KU-HAR, WISDM, and HMDB51, respectively. This comparison underscores the model's robustness, highlighting improvements in minimizing false positives and false negatives, which are crucial for real-world applications where reliable predictions are essential. The experiments were conducted with various window sizes (50ms, 100ms, 200ms, 500ms, 1s, and 2s). The results indicate that the proposed method achieves high accuracy and reliability across these different window sizes, highlighting its ability to adapt to varying temporal granularities without significant loss of performance. This demonstrates the method's effectiveness and robustness, making it well-suited for deployment in diverse HAR scenarios. Notably, the best results were obtained with a window size of 200ms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.