Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016187›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025

Neurofind: using deep learning to make individualised inferences in brain-based disorders.

S Vieira, L Baecker, W H L Pinaya, R Garcia-Dias, C Scarpazza, V Calhoun, A Mechelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S VieiraDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
L BaeckerDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-0292
W H L PinayaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
R Garcia-DiasDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-1580
C ScarpazzaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4126-426X
V CalhounTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-0747
A MechelliDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. a.mechelli@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2934

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
MAPPING THE HUMAN CONNECTOME DURING TYPICAL AGINGU01AG052564 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SALAT, DAVID H, TERPSTRA, MELISSA J · 2016 to 2020
$18.9M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAP20RR021938 · NCRR · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI HANLON, FAITH MARIE · 2008 to 2011
$9.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR021938NIA NIH HHS U01 AG052564NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 220402/Z/20/ZWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 221638/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within precision psychiatry, there is a growing interest in normative models given their ability to parse heterogeneity. While they are intuitive and informative, the technical expertise and resources required to develop normative models may not be accessible to most researchers. Here we present Neurofind, a new freely available tool that bridges this gap by wrapping sound and previously tested methods on data harmonisation and advanced normative models into a web-based platform that requires minimal input from the user. We explain how Neurofind was developed, how to use the Neurofind website in four simple steps ( www.neurofind.ai ), and provide exemplar applications. Neurofind takes as input structural MRI images and outputs two main metrics derived from independent normative models: (1) Outlier Index Score, a deviation score from the normative brain morphology, and (2) Brain Age, the predicted age based on an individual's brain morphometry. The tool was trained on 3362 images of healthy controls aged 20-80 from publicly available datasets. The volume of 101 cortical and subcortical regions was extracted and modelled with an adversarial autoencoder for the Outlier index model and a support vector regression for the Brain age model. To illustrate potential applications, we applied Neurofind to 364 images from three independent datasets of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. In Alzheimer's disease, 55.2% of patients had very extreme Outlier Index Scores, mostly driven by larger deviations in temporal-limbic structures and ventricles. Patients were also homogeneous in how they deviated from the norm. Conversely, only 30.1% of schizophrenia patients were extreme outliers, due to deviations in the hippocampus and pallidum, and patients tended to be more heterogeneous than controls. Both groups showed signs of accelerated brain ageing.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningSchizophreniaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40016187
PMCPMC11868583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.