ArticleChemical research in toxicology2025
(Q)SAR Approaches to Predict the Extent of Nitrosation in Pharmaceutical Compounds.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Losartan API and Nitrosamines Impurities-Stability Profile Investigation Using HPLC, LC-MS, and In Silico Assessment.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since their discovery as impurities in numerous pharmaceuticals beginning in 2018, there has been a strong push to predict and prevent the formation of mutagenic nitrosamines. Several experimental methods, particularly the Nitrosation Assay Procedure, have been developed to predict a molecule's susceptibility to nitrosation. Here, we have compiled the results of hundreds of these experiments from the literature to construct two structure-activity relationship models: a statistical model and an expert rule-based model. The statistical model has been built with graph neural networks and was trained on a dataset of 207 nitrogen-containing molecules. This model makes a binary call for each nitrogen center, predicting if it is likely to be nitrosated or not. Conversely, the rule-based model labels each possible nitrosamine product as one of four categories, ranging from "unlikely" to "very likely". It makes this determination based on 15 rules, which cover 12 deactivating (inhibit nitrosation) and 3 activating (favor nitrosation) features that have been drawn from the literature. Both models perform remarkably well, with accuracies of ∼80%. The rule-based model is generally biased toward favoring nitrosation while the statistical model is more likely to classify an amine as un-nitrosatable due to the makeup of the dataset. Using the models together can balance these biases and further improve the reliability of both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.