Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40015985›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Dorsal-Ventral Reinforcement Learning Network Connectivity and Incentive-Driven Changes in Exploration.

Ethan M Campbell, Wanting Zhong, Jeremy Hogeveen, Jordan Grafman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ethan M CampbellDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131 ecampbell@unm.edu jhogeveen@unm.edu.
Wanting ZhongCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Brain Injury Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
Jeremy HogeveenDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131 ecampbell@unm.edu jhogeveen@unm.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9612-2085
Jordan GrafmanCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Brain Injury Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

Funding

University of New Mexico (UNM) Center for Brain Recovery and RepairP20GM109089 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI SHUTTLEWORTH, CLAUDE W · 2015 to 2024
$22.7M
Neurodevelopment of exploration and alcohol problems in adolescenceR01AA030283 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Jeremy P Hogeveen · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA030283NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probabilistic reinforcement learning (RL) tasks assay how individuals make decisions under uncertainty. The use of internal models (model-based) or direct learning from experiences (model-free), and the degree of choice stochasticity across alternatives (i.e., exploration), can all be influenced by the state space of the decision-making task. There is considerable individual variation in the balance between model-based and model-free control during decision-making, and this balance is affected by incentive motivation. The effect of variable reward incentives on the arbitration between model-based and model-free learning remains understudied, and individual differences in neural signatures and cognitive traits that moderate the effect of reward on model-free/model-based control are unknown. Here we combined a two-stage decision-making task utilizing differing reward incentives with computational modeling, neuropsychological tests, and neuroimaging to address these questions. Results showed the prospect of greater reward decreased exploration of alternative options and increased the balance toward model-based learning. These behavioral effects were replicated across two independent datasets including both sexes. Individual differences in processing speed and analytical thinking style affected how reward altered the dependence on both systems. Using a systems neuroscience-inspired approach to resting-state functional connectivity, we found reduced exploration of the options during the first stage of our task under high relative to low incentives was predicted by increased cross-network coupling between ventral and dorsal RL circuitry. These findings suggest that integrity of functional connections between stimulus valuation (ventral) and action valuation (dorsal) RL networks is associated with changes in the balance between explore-exploit decisions under changing reward incentives.

Indexed as

BrainExploratory BehaviorMotivationNerve NetReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRewardYoung Adultcomputational modelingdecision-makingdorsal/ventral networksfMRIfunctional connectivityreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40015985
PMCPMC11984077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.