SynthesisThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Effect of a single nonpharmacological intervention on cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exercise modalities in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Neuroimaging biomarkers of neuroprotection: Impact of voluntary versus enforced exercise in Alzheimer's disease models.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most studies of nonpharmacological interventions have used a combination of medications in experimental and control groups to improve cognitive functioning or to control symptoms, but the results have been inconsistent with respect to the effects of single nonpharmacological interventions on cognitive functioning in older patients with Alzheimer's disease. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a single nonpharmacological intervention on cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in the first week of January 2024, searching eight electronic databases for articles that reflect on non-pharmacological interventions in Alzheimer's disease published between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 2023. All included articles had to be randomized controlled trials. The primary measure was the change in cognitive function before and after the intervention. Data were extracted by two authors and quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook. With the exception of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale [MD=2.99, 95% CI (-0.66,6.63)], the differences between the intervention group and the control group were significant for all the remaining scales, namely, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [SMD=0.65, 95% CI (0.15,1.15)], Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL) [MD=-2.30, 95% CI (-3.63,0.97)], Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QoL-AD) [MD=5.03, 95% CI (2.27,7.78)], Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [MD=-2.16, 95% CI (-3.86,0.46)], and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive score (ADAS-cog) [MD=-5.21, 95% CI (-7.89,2.54)]. Subgroup analysis revealed that the most effective intervention was exercise therapy, followed by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. On the other hand, music therapy was not found to be effective. Current evidence suggests that nonpharmacological interventions can be used to improve cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. This study was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024497247).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.