ArticleDevelopmental cell2025
Deletion of a single CTCF motif at the boundary of a chromatin domain with three FGF genes disrupts gene expression and embryonic development.
Article in Developmental cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcription and Three-Dimensional Genome Organization: Cause, Consequence, or Coordination?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Mapping 3D genome organization at nucleosome-scale with Micro-C and Region Capture Micro-C (RCMC).Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Genome-wide absolute quantification of chromatin looping.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026Article
- Live-cell imaging of enhancer-promoter dynamics reveals transient contact-driven gene activation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Cohesin bridging as a physical principle of enhancer-promoter communication.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Proteasome alteration between epithelial and hematopoietic cells facilitates positive selection of CD8 T cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- TAD boundaries and gene activity are uncoupled.eLife · 2026Article
- TAD boundaries and gene activity are uncoupled.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cohesin in 3D: development, differentiation, and disease.Genes & development · 2025Review
- A boundary-defining protein facilitates megabase-scale regulatory chromosomal loop formation inGenes & development · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromatin domains delimited by CTCF can restrict the range of enhancer action. However, disruption of some domain boundaries results in mild gene dysregulation and phenotypes. We tested whether perturbing a domain with multiple developmental regulators would lead to more severe outcomes. We chose a domain with three FGF ligand genes-Fgf3, Fgf4, and Fgf15-that control different murine developmental processes. Heterozygous deletion of a 23.9-kb boundary defined by four CTCF sites led to ectopic interactions of the FGF genes with enhancers active in the brain and induced FGF expression. This caused orofacial clefts, encephalocele, and fully penetrant perinatal lethality. Loss of the single CTCF motif oriented toward the enhancers-but not the three toward the FGF genes-recapitulated these phenotypes. Our works shows that small sequence variants at particular domain boundaries can have a surprisingly outsized effect and must be considered as potential sources of gene dysregulation in development and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.