ArticleCancer research communications2025
A Proteomic Signature for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Predicts Patients at High Risk of Recurrence.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic resistance in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: molecular mechanisms, clinical challenges, and precision strategies.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Deciphering Radiotherapy Resistance: A Proteomic Perspective.Proteomes · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAlthough human papillomavirus (HPV)–positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is associated with better prognosis than HPV-negative disease, ∼30% of cases relapse despite curative-intent radiotherapy (±chemotherapy). We aimed to develop a proteomic signature associated with risk of recurrence within HPV+OPSCC. We analyzed tumor specimens from 124 patients with T1–4N0–3M0 HPV+OPSCC: 50 patients with residual or recurrent disease within 5 years of treatment and 74 age and performance status–matched patients with no recurrence. Proteomic analysis was performed on archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumor core biopsy specimens and matched normal adjacent tissues using quantitative data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), both locoregional and distant, was the primary endpoint. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified peptides associated with RFS, from which a risk score was established to generate a peptide-based signature. A total of 7,597 protein groups were identified across the cohort, 1,565 of which were differentially abundant between tumor and normal adjacent tissues, with 1,218 being significantly increased in tumors. Improved 5-year RFS (q-value < 0.5) was associated with 405 differentially abundant peptides (from 233 unique proteins) within the 124 tumors. Among them a 26-peptide signature encompassing 26 protein groups was associated with RFS and was able to stratify patients into low, intermediate, or high risk of recurrence (concordance index = 0.941, P < 0.0001). Data available via ProteomeXchange PXD036891. Overall, a 26-peptide signature can be used to risk-stratify HPV+OPSCC. Validation of this proteomic prognostic signature in an independent cohort is required to assess its potential use in future clinical trials to better tailor initial therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: HPV+OPSCC incidence is increasing, with heterogeneous treatment outcomes despite favorable prognosis. Current de-escalation strategies show inferior results, highlighting the need for precise risk stratification. Using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry proteomics, we identified a 26-peptide signature that stratifies patients into risk categories, potentially enabling personalized treatment decisions and optimal patient selection for de-escalation trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.