ArticleActa odontologica latinoamericana : AOL2024
Apical extrusion following different glide path instrumentation in curved canals of mandibular molars.
Article in Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endodontic failures are usually the result of technical errors compromising the proper endodontic procedures required to control and prevent periradicular infections. Among these errors, the extrusion of materials through the apical foramen has been associated with periapical inflammation, postoperative pain, tissue necrosis, delayed periapical healing and long-term failure.
aimTo compare the debris extruded through the apical foramen when different glide path files are used prior to endodontic instrumentation with the WaveOne Gold Primary file. MATERIALS AND
methodTwenty-four mesial roots of extracted human mandibular first molars were divided into three groups (n=8): C-Pilot hand file (CPH) #15/.02; R-Pilot (RPL); WaveOne Gold Glider (WGG). The roots were placed in Eppendorf tubes containing 1.5% agar gel and weighed before and after instrumentation to calculate the weight of debris and irrigant solution extruded. Apical extrusion of debris was compared using one-way analysis of variance. The Games-Howell test was used for multiple comparisons due to heteroscedasticity, with a significance level of 5%.
resultsDebris extrusion was significantly lower with the WaveOne Gold Glider file than with the R-Pilot file, which in turn produced less extrusion than the C-Pilot file.
conclusionAll glide path files caused apical extrusion, with the WaveOne Gold Glider causing the least.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.