ArticleRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)2025
Copy number variations in the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort for Mental Conditions.
Article in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study's purpose was to characterize copy number variations in a Brazilian cohort regarding frequency and inheritance patterns and to determine the effect of copy number variations previously associated with mental health disorders on the risk of developing these disorders.
methodsA total of 2,250 probands and 3,174 parents (897 trios) from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study for Mental Conditions (BHRCS) were genotyped, with copy number variations detected using PennCNV software.
resultsIn total, 56.03% of the copy number variations were inherited. Among the distinct copy number variations, 96.15% were rare (frequency < 1% in the BHRCS). Duplications in 2q13 and 15q13.3 were less frequent, while those in 2q11.2 and 16p11.2 were more frequent in the BHRCS than in databases such as the Database of Genomic Variants and the Genome Aggregation Database. Of the 40 copy number variations previously associated with mental health disorders, 18 were identified in the sample. While duplication in 7q11.2 has been considered protective for schizophrenia, we found that deletion in 7q11.2 was protective for mental health disorders (p = 0.033, OR = 0.103). No significant results were found for the other copy number variations, despite mild effect sizes.
conclusionsThis is one of the largest copy number variation studies to have been conducted in a Brazilian sample, and it will be a valuable resource for future meta-analysis, advancing our understanding of the genetics of mental health disorders, especially in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.