ArticleJournal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association2025
A Goal-Concordant Prescribing Conceptual Framework: Implications for Practice and Measurement.
Article in Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The 4Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing medication benefit and minimizing harm through effective and appropriate medication management is emerging as an important strategy in hospice and palliative care. This approach, however, often fails to align patient and family goals for remaining life with clinician priorities. Ascertaining patient and caregiver values and goals and aligning these goals with clinicians' priorities for care is a complex and iterative process. This process requires effective communication between all participants as a patient's illness trajectory moves toward death. The purpose of this article was to present a beginning conceptual framework for clinical consideration and use, as well as an example of a potential measurement framework envisioned from the conceptual framework for future research application. Both frameworks focus on goal-concordant prescribing among seriously ill older adults in home hospice. An environmental scan of existing deprescribing frameworks and approaches to goal ascertainment that inform hospice deprescribing was conducted. Feedback from practicing hospice clinicians engaged in a pilot project implementing a novel goal-concordant prescribing approach, as well as interprofessional clinicians and family caregivers from previous projects, were also used to identify theoretical and clinically relevant gaps in care as well as future research opportunities. The environmental scan and multiproject feedback served as the foundation for the development of the conceptual framework. The suggested communication frameworks for goal-concordant prescribing seek to bridge the gap between the preferences and priorities of the patient and family caregiver, and the risk-benefit considerations brought forth by clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.