ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Automated Detection of Retinal Detachment Using Deep Learning-Based Segmentation on Ocular Ultrasonography Images.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An ultrasound foundation model for the stratification of vision impairment and eye cancer risk.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Shaping the future of myopia: artificial intelligence for vitreoretinal complications of high and pathologic myopia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- OBUSight: Clinically Aligned Generative AI for Ophthalmic Ultrasound Interpretation and Diagnosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based detection of retinal detachment with vitreous hemorrhage in ocular ultrasound images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop an automated pipeline to detect retinal detachment from B-scan ocular ultrasonography (USG) images by using deep learning-based segmentation. Methods: A computational pipeline consisting of an encoder-decoder segmentation network and a machine learning classifier was developed, trained, and validated using 279 B-scan ocular USG images from 204 patients, including 66 retinal detachment (RD) images, 36 posterior vitreous detachment images, and 177 healthy control images. Performance metrics, including the precision, recall, and F-scores, were calculated for both segmentation and RD detection. Results: The overall pipeline achieved 96.3% F-score for RD detection, outperforming end-to-end deep learning classification models (ResNet-50 and MobileNetV3) with 94.3% and 95.0% F-scores. This improvement was also validated on an independent test set, where the proposed pipeline led to 96.5% F-score, but the classification models yielded only 62.1% and 84.9% F-scores, respectively. Besides, the segmentation model of this pipeline led to high performances across multiple ocular structures, with 84.7%, 78.3%, and 88.2% F-scores for retina/choroid, sclera, and optic nerve sheath segmentation, respectively. The segmentation model outperforms the standard UNet, particularly in challenging RD cases, where it effectively segmented detached retina regions. Conclusions: The proposed automated segmentation and classification method improves RD detection in B-scan ocular USG images compared to end-to-end classification models, offering potential clinical benefits in resource-limited settings. Translational Relevance: We have developed a novel deep/machine learning based pipeline that has the potential to significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and accessibility for ocular USG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.