ArticleJournal of vision2025
Temporal dynamics of human color processing measured using a continuous tracking task.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Color discrimination in action: High-throughput measurement in immersive VR.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Article
- A Common Prescription Lens Correction Causes Motion Illusions in the Presbyopic and General Populations.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Monovision-induced motion illusions in presbyopic and non-presbyopic populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Revealing temporal dynamics of the visuomotor system via continuous tracking of position and attribute.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We characterized the temporal dynamics of color processing using a continuous tracking paradigm by estimating subjects' temporal lag in tracking chromatic Gabor targets. To estimate the lag, we computed the cross-correlation between the velocities of the Gabor target's random walk and the velocities of the subject's tracking. Lag was taken as the time of the peak of the resulting cross-correlogram. We measured how the lag changes as a function of chromatic direction and contrast for stimuli in the LS cone contrast plane. In the same set of subjects, we also measured detection thresholds for stimuli with matched spatial, temporal, and chromatic properties. We created a model of tracking and detection performance to test whether a common representation of chromatic contrast accounts for both measures. The model summarizes the effect of chromatic contrast over different chromatic directions through elliptical isoperformance contours, the shapes of which are contrast independent. The fitted elliptical isoperformance contours have essentially the same orientation in the detection and tracking tasks. For the tracking task, however, there is a striking reduction in relative sensitivity to signals originating in the S cones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.