Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40014294›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025

Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Post-Heart Transplant Patient.

Aris Karatasakis, Omid Kiamanesh, Richard K Cheng, James N Kirkpatrick, David M Dudzinski

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aris Karatasakis *Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Omid Kiamanesh *Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Richard K ChengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
James N KirkpatrickDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
David M DudzinskiSection of Critical Care Cardiology and Echocardiography Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. ddudzinski@partners.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSignificant practice variability exists with respect to the role and frequency of echocardiography after heart transplantation. We sought to illustrate key studies relating to the utility and diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for the post-heart transplant patient. RECENT

findingsSeveral echocardiographic parameters correlate with acute heart transplant rejection, but there is enough heterogeneity between study results or in diagnostic accuracy, such that it precludes parameter use in isolation to rule out rejection. Newer techniques such as strain echocardiography may have better sensitivity. Similarly, resting and stress echocardiography can be combined with modern techniques such as myocardial contrast echocardiography to diagnose and prognosticate cardiac allograft vasculopathy, but studies have again demonstrated variable accuracy. Echocardiography remains an accessible tool in the evaluation and management of patients after heart transplantation. This modality can guide clinical judgment with real-time data and several fairly sensitive parameters for the detection of rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and other abnormalities. Often, auxiliary diagnostic modalities need to be combined to optimize diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyGraft RejectionHeart TransplantationEchocardiography, StressHumansAcute rejectionCardiac allograft vasculopathyEchocardiographyHeart transplantation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.