ArticleOral radiology2025
Comparison of stimulated and unstimulated salivary gland parenchyma using fractal analysis of ultrasonographic images.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fractal analysis in dentistry: a bibliometric analysis (1991-2024).Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Ultrasonographic fractal dimension analysis for quantitative assessment of smoking-related parenchymal pattern complexity of the parotid gland.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ultrasonographic evaluation of submandibular salivary glands in female patients with hypothyroidism: a fractal analysis study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the fractal analysis data of ultrasonography (USG) images of the submandibular and parotid glands before and after parenchymal stimulation to assess for any changes.
methodsThe study was conducted by taking 240 USG images of bilateral parotid and submandibular glands of 30 patients before and after stimulation. Patients chewed gum for stimulating their salivary glands. Fractal analysis was performed on the USG images, and the data obtained were statistically compared.
resultsThe fractal analysis value of the USG images of the parotid gland was 1.45, both before and after stimulation, indicating no statistically significant difference (p = 0.866). In the submandibular gland, this value was the same before and after stimulation (fractal analysis = 1.42), showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.748). Parotid and submandibular glands were compared. USG fractal analysis values before and after stimulation and the overall values were statistically significantly different between the different salivary glands (p < 0.05).
conclusionAccording to fractal analysis, there was no change in the parenchyma of the submandibular and parotid glands despite the stimulation. Submandibular and parotid glands could be distinguished by fractal analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40014279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.