Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40014261›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

What Predicts Changes in the Work Situation of Recently Diagnosed People with Multiple Sclerosis and do these Predictors also Apply to Healthy People?

Shalina R D Saddal, Karin van der Hiele, Ehsan Motazedi, Elianne E A van Egmond, Leo H Visser, Pauline T Waskowiak, Amber van der Kruit, Maureen van Dam, Menno M Schoonheim, Vincent de Groot and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shalina R D SaddalMS Center Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Van Der Boechorstraat 7, 1081BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.saddal@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-2796
Karin van der HieleHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ehsan MotazediDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Universiteit Van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elianne E A van EgmondHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leo H VisserDepartment of Neurology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Pauline T WaskowiakHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Amber van der KruitHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maureen van DamHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Menno M SchoonheimMS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location Vumc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent de GrootMS Center Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vumc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanneke E HulstHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frederieke G SchaafsmaMS Center Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Van Der Boechorstraat 7, 1081BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 842003003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study associations of baseline predictors with work difficulties and number of working hours after one year in recently diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Furthermore, to analyze whether these predictors are generic, i.e., apply to healthy people as well, or are disease specific.

methodsTEMPRANO and MS@Work data were combined resulting in a dataset of 135 recently diagnosed PwMS (≤ 1 year) and 172 healthy people. We analyzed the associations of baseline predictors that fit within the international classification of functioning and health (ICF) framework using a mixed-effect negative-binomial model with log link for work difficulties and number of working hours after one year, and fitted each model using a fully Bayesian approach.

resultsSlower information processing speed was a disease-specific predictor for more work difficulties after one year (posterior mean ratio (PMR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.69, 0.97]). Higher conscientiousness was a generic predictor for more working hours after one year (PMR = 1.02, 95%CI = [1.01, 1.03] for PwMS and PMR = 1.01, 95% CI = [1.00, 1.02] for healthy people). Being male (PMR = 0.75, 95% CI = [0.58, 0.96]), being younger (PMR = 0.99, 95% CI = [0.98, 1.00]), higher information processing speed (PMR = 1.08, 95% CI = [1.04, 1.13]), better learning and memory (PMR = 1.09, 95% CI = [1.03, 1.15]), and mentally burdensome job tasks (PMR = 1.36, 95% CI = [1.22, 1.52]) were disease-specific predictors for more working hours after one year.

conclusionFor recently diagnosed PwMS, disease-specific predictors that fit within the ICF framework associate with perceived work difficulties and working hours after one year.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAdultBayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWork Capacity EvaluationCognitionConscientiousnessMultiple sclerosisWork

Identifiers

PMID40014261
PMCPMC13099700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.