ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025
Applications of Gene Editing and Nanotechnology in Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Human Diseases.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurons Die Not by One Hit, but by Signaling Convergence.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- The role of stem cells in precision medicine: next-generation cancer treatment.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Review
- Deciphering and targeting oncogenic pathways through integrated approaches and amino acid metabolism in hematologic malignancies.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Current status and new horizons in stem cell therapy in cardiovascular regenerative medicine (CaVaReM): an update.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Advancing prostate cancer research: an exploration of periprostatic adipose stem cells.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Management of male premature ejaculation: from past to future.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles Targeted Delivery System: In Treatment Approach for Dyslipidemia.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-Based therapeutics as a promising strategy for management of Alzheimer's disease: progress and prospects.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cell research is a dynamic and fast-advancing discipline with great promise for the treatment of diverse human disorders. The incorporation of gene editing technologies, including ZFNs, TALENs, and the CRISPR/Cas system, in conjunction with progress in nanotechnology, is fundamentally transforming stem cell therapy and research. These innovations not only provide a glimmer of optimism for patients and healthcare practitioners but also possess the capacity to radically reshape medical treatment paradigms. Gene editing and nanotechnology synergistically enhance stem cell-based therapies' precision, efficiency, and applicability, offering transformative potential for treating complex diseases and advancing regenerative medicine. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that these technologies also give rise to ethical considerations and possible hazards, such as inadvertent genetic modifications and the development of genetically modified organisms, therefore creating a new age of designer infants. This review emphasizes the crucial significance of gene editing technologies and nanotechnology in the progress of stem cell treatments, particularly for degenerative pathologies and injuries. It emphasizes their capacity to restructure and comprehensively revolutionize medical treatment paradigms, providing fresh hope and optimism for patients and healthcare practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40014250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.