ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025
Fluoroquinolones and tendon injury: a 5-year review of Irish national incident and claims data.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrospective Analysis of Malpractice Claims Following Achilles Tendon Rupture.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimIn 2018, the European Medicines Agency strengthened warnings in relation to fluoroquinolone (FQ)-associated tendon injury. There is a lack of published data on FQs and tendon injury in an Irish context. The aim of the study was to investigate incidents and claims relating to FQs and tendon injury through an analysis of National Incident Management System (NIMS) data.
methodsThe NIMS database was searched for incidents created between 1st June 2018 and 31st May 2023 which involved any FQ and referenced tendon injury. The incident data was analysed under predetermined field headings. NIMS was also searched for clinical claims involving any FQ with a Claim Finalised Date between 1st June 2018 and 31st May 2023. The claims were analysed to identify common themes.
resultsThe study identified 20 incidents which related to FQs and tendon injury, although only six reported an actual tendon injury. In 15 (75%) of the incidents, the prescription of a FQ was deemed inappropriate by the reporter. The study found four finalised claims, all of which related to bilateral Achilles tendon rupture following FQ exposure. In all four cases, the patient was aged over 60 and the injury occurred within days of commencing treatment.
conclusionsThis study confirms that FQs continue to be prescribed inappropriately in high-risk patients and that incidents of tendon injury following FQ exposure continue to occur despite regulatory moves of raise awareness of this issue. Additional measures to minimise the risk of avoidable patient harm may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40014235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.