SynthesisCell and tissue banking2025
Application of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF) after posterior tooth removal surgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Cell and tissue banking, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF) is primarily found in liquid form and plays a role in accelerating vascularization and aiding wound healing. To carry out a critical analysis of the therapeutic potential of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF) in the postoperative management of these surgeries. The systematic review protocol for this study included start and end dates, research question, databases, PICO structure, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, types of studies, measures of effect, screening methods, data extraction/analysis and risk of bias assessment tools. Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024537367), it guaranteed transparency and quality. Searches were carried out on the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Wiley Online Library and Web of Science databases. Results: The systematic search in the databases identified 532 studies. After removing duplicates with Rayyan© software, 480 documents remained, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. After evaluation following the review protocol, 5 studies were considered highly relevant and included in the systematic review. The results indicated not only uncomplicated healing and adequate osseointegration, but also a significant improvement in comfort parameters and post-operative recovery. It was observed that the application of I-PRF accelerated the healing process, reduced pain and edema, and improved soft and hard tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40014206What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.