Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40014197›Full record

Observational studyCurrent medical science2025

Machine Learning-Based Mortality Prediction for Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit.

Zhou Liu, Liang Zhang, Gui-Jun Jiang, Qian-Qian Chen, Yan-Guang Hou, Wei Wu, Muskaan Malik, Guang Li, Li-Ying Zhan

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhou LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Liang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Gui-Jun JiangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Qian-Qian ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Yan-Guang HouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Wei WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Muskaan MalikThe First Clinical Medical School of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Guang LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China. guangli@whu.edu.cn.
Li-Ying ZhanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China. zhanliying@whu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Program key projects 2023HX0054National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars 82302418Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University JCRCZN-2022-005Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University JCRCZN-2022-017Wuhan Science and Technology Project 2023020201010165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict the mortality of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and compared their prognostic performance with that of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score.

methodsA total of 961 AGIB patients admitted to the ICU of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2020 to December 2023 were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 768) and the validation cohort (n = 193). Clinical data were collected within the first 24 h of ICU admission. ML models were constructed using Python V.3.7 package, employing 3 different algorithms: XGBoost, Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of different models.

resultsA total of 94 patients died with an overall mortality of 9.78% (11.32% in the training cohort and 8.96% in the validation cohort). Among the 3 ML models, the GBDT algorithm demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.99), while the AUCs of XGBoost and RF models were 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.96) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.96), respectively. In comparison, the APACHE-II model achieved an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.87), with a specificity of 70.97% (95% CI 64.07-77.01). When APACHE-II score was incorporated into the GBDT algorithm, the ensemble model achieved an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99) with a sensitivity of 85.71% and a specificity up to 95.15%.

conclusionsThe GBDT model serves as a reliable tool for accurately predicting the in-hospital mortality for AGIB patients. When integrated with the APACHE-II score, the ensemble GBDT algorithm further enhances predictive accuracy and provides valuable insights for prognostic evaluation.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal HemorrhageIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overAPACHEArea Under CurveBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsDecision TreesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisAcute gastrointestinal bleedingAPACHE-IIArtificial intelligenceIntensive care unitMachine learningMortality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.