Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40014177›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Greenhouse gas emissions from Fleckvieh cattle production systems in the Amazon region, Peru.

Deysi Ruiz-Llontop, Segundo M Portocarrero-Villegas, Hugo Frias, Luis Murga, Joe Mantilla-Oliva, Dante M Pizarro, José Velarde-Guillén, José Américo Saucedo-Uriarte

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Deysi Ruiz-LlontopInstituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología de La Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, 01001, Amazonas, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6183-3722
Segundo M Portocarrero-VillegasInstituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología de La Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, 01001, Amazonas, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-9792
Hugo FriasInstituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología de La Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, 01001, Amazonas, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0224-1935
Luis MurgaInstituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología de La Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, 01001, Amazonas, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1473-9055
Joe Mantilla-OlivaGENEX CDP, Cajamarca, 060101, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2195-9663
Dante M PizarroDepartment of Animal & Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-5579
José Velarde-GuillénFacultad de Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, La Molina, Lima, 15024, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-5226
José Américo Saucedo-UriarteInstituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología de La Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, 01001, Amazonas, Peru. saucedouriarte@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-6402

Funding

Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas CUI N° 2202488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify the carbon footprint (CF) from Fleckvieh cattle production systems in the Amazon region of Peru. Ten farms distributed across four provinces: Chachapoyas (System I; n = 2), Bongara (System II; n = 4), Rodriguez de Mendoza (System III; n = 2), and Utcubamba (System IV; n = 2) were assessed. Parameters such as average live weight, animal units (AU), dry matter intake, fat and protein-corrected milk (FPCM), digestibility, and protein content of consumed forage were analyzed. CF was calculated using the 2019 Refinement to 2006 IPCC guidelines. The database was analyzed using analysis of variance and Duncan's statistical test (p < 0.05) to compare the systems. A Pearson correlation was carried out to observe the variables association level. Results revealed a CF of 2.50, 2.70 and 2.65 kg CO

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryCarbon FootprintGreenhouse GasesAnimal FeedAnimalsCattleFemaleMethaneMilkNitrous OxidePeruGreenhouse GasesMethaneNitrous OxideFleckvieh cattleLife cycle assessmentMethaneNitrous oxide

Identifiers

PMID40014177
PMCPMC11868227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.