ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2025
Single-cell profiling and clinical characteristics analysis of lung squamous carcinoma.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pan-cancer characterization of POSTN and its clinical and microenvironmental associations in ERScientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification of Cystatin 3 as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Osteoporosis Using Machine Learning.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC) is a highly heterogeneous disease. However, the tumor microenvironment (TME) landscape and clinical characteristics for LUSC have not yet been elucidated. To map the TME and clinical characteristics of LUSC, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing for 504 LUSC samples on basis of TCGA and Gene Expression Omnibus. We introduced the computational algorithms "ESTIMATE" and "CIBERSORT" to analyze immune cell infiltration and immune-checkpoint-related gene signatures in various LUSC clusters. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was used to explore the connections between molecular characteristics and clinical traits in LUSC. A prognostic model was constructed by performing multivariate COX. Two gene clusters exhibiting disparate immune and clinical characteristics were identified. Our findings indicate that patients in cluster 2, who have a more favorable prognosis, exhibit immune characteristics such as elevated levels of immunosuppression-associated M2 macrophages, resting memory CD4 T cells, resting dendritic cells (DC), and TNFRSF4, alongside reduced infiltration of activated DC and lower expression of TNFRSF18.Whereafter, the Risk Score model was built on basis of 3-DEGs signature consisted of cystatin C (CST3), transglutaminase type 2 (TGM2), JUN, which were proved by q-PCR and immunofluorescence. Besides, high-Risk Score may be responsible for poor prognosis in LUSC patients. Our study identified that tumor-infiltrating immune cell subtypes and the Risk Score model might shed light on the heterogeneity in LUSC patients. The TME, three DEGs and Risk Score can effectively serve as biomarkers to elucidate the immune landscape and predict prognosis in LUSC patients. They may provide insights to the investigations on therapeutic strategies for LUSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40014154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.